Bridging the Gap: Why Nature Must Be at the Heart of Planning Reform

The recent findings from Green Groups have revealed that 59% of English local authorities have failed to meet their biodiversity duty requirements and signals a critical juncture in our approach to planning and development. As we stand on the cusp of the upcoming Planning and Infrastructure Bill, this sobering statistic demands more than just acknowledgment – it calls for a fundamental rethinking of how we integrate nature into our planning systems.

The challenge before us is clear, we must bridge the growing disconnect between our ambitious environmental targets and the practical capacity of local authorities to deliver them. With only 41% of local authorities having considered biodiversity actions with supporting policies, and a mere 5% possessing the necessary ecological expertise, we’re facing a capability crisis at the local government level.

However, this crisis also presents an opportunity. The forthcoming Planning and Infrastructure Bill offers a once-in-a-generation chance to reimagine how we approach development in harmony with nature. The solution lies not in viewing environmental considerations as constraints on growth, but rather in recognising them as fundamental drivers of sustainable development and community wellbeing.

Three key pillars should underpin this transformation:

About this article

Specialism

Highways Engineering | Structural Engineering

We need a systemic approach to embedding nature-based solutions (NbS) within planning frameworks

This means moving beyond token green spaces to implementing comprehensive strategies that deliver multiple benefits, from flood management and air quality improvement to biodiversity enhancement and community health. The current ‘biodiversity duty’ should be strengthened with clear, measurable objectives and adequate resources for implementation.

Local authorities need to be empowered

This means both financial resources and expertise. The statistics show that without dedicated ecological expertise, even well-intentioned policies falter in implementation. A national framework for building local environmental planning capacity is essential, supported by stable funding mechanisms.

We must recognise that nature-friendly planning is not a barrier to development but rather a catalyst for better, more resilient communities:

The evidence is compelling – developments that integrate natural features deliver higher long-term value, both in terms of property prices and community wellbeing. From sustainable drainage systems to green corridors, NbS offer practical answers to many urban challenges.

Looking ahead, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill must include statutory requirements for:

  • Mandatory ecological expertise within planning departments
  • Integration of Local Nature Recovery Strategies into all development plans
  • Clear mechanisms for funding and implementing nature-based solutions
  • Strengthened protection for existing natural assets
  • Measurable biodiversity net gain requirements

The recent criticism of environmental regulations as ‘blockers to growth’ misses the fundamental point – nature-friendly planning isn’t about stopping development; it’s about doing development better.

The cost of inaction is clear. With only 2.92% of England’s land effectively protected for nature, and biodiversity declining at unprecedented rates, we cannot afford to treat environmental considerations as an afterthought in planning. The upcoming Bill must serve as a watershed moment in how we approach development, ensuring that NbS and green infrastructure are not just optional extras but fundamental components of all planning decisions.

As we move forward, the success of our planning system will be measured not just in the number of homes built or infrastructure projects completed, but in how effectively we create resilient, nature-rich communities that stand the test of time. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill represents our best opportunity to make this vision a reality – we must ensure it delivers on both environmental and development needs.

The choice before us is not between development and nature protection – it’s about recognising the most successful development will be that which works with nature, not against it. The time for this transformation is now.